Article Text

PDF
Hepatitis B in a vaccinated soldier: a case report
  1. Keri McLean1,2,
  2. T B Elmer3,
  3. D A Freshwater4,
  4. L Lamb5,6,7 and
  5. S D Woolley1,8,9
  1. 1Tropical and Infectious Diseases Unit, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
  2. 2Department of Eye and Vision Science, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
  3. 3Defence Public Health Unit, Defence Medical Services Ringgold standard institution, Lichfield, UK
  4. 4The Liver and Hepatobiliary Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
  5. 5Department of Infection, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
  6. 6Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK
  7. 7Academic Department of Military Medicine, Royal Centre of Defence Medicine, Birmingham, UK
  8. 8Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
  9. 9Institute of Naval Medicine, Alverstoke, Hampshire, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Keri McLean, Tropical and Infectious Diseases Unit, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, L7 8XP, UK; kerimclean{at}doctors.org.uk

Abstract

Assessing for an adequate immunological response to a pre-exposure course of hepatitis B vaccine is not routinely recommended in all vaccinated individuals. Current UK guidelines advise checking hepatitis B surface antibody titres only in those considered at high occupational risk such as healthcare and laboratory workers. We present a case of an infantry soldier who developed acute hepatitis B despite having a complete course of hepatitis B vaccinations. This case emphasises that hepatitis B is still an important differential diagnosis for all returning military personnel who present with compatible symptoms despite being vaccinated.

  • hepatitis
  • hep B
  • vaccine

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors KM wrote the manuscript with TBE, DAF and LL contributing to the report discussion. SDW conceived the idea for the case report, contributed to its writing and is the guarantor for the publication. All authors approved of the final version.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.