Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Phosgene use in World War 1 and early evaluations of pathophysiology
  1. T C Nicholson-Roberts
  1. Southampton Centre for Biomedical Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
  1. Correspondence to T C Nicholson-Roberts, Southampton Centre for Biomedical Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; tcnr{at}doctors.org.uk
  • Present affiliation The present affiliation of T C Nicholson-Roberts is: Neurosciences Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom

Abstract

World War 1 ended 100 years ago. The aftermath included the consolidation of significant advances in medical care of casualties. Some of these advances were made in the care of chemical casualties, in particular the mechanisms of toxicity and treatment of phosgene exposure. Phosgene, or carbonyl chloride, is an extremely poisonous vapour that was used to devastating effect during World War 1. Observations made of acutely poisoned casualties formed the basis of much research in the early post-World War 1 era. Some extremely elegant experiments, some at the nascent Porton Down research facility, further evaluated the toxin and defences against it. Researchers drew on knowledge that was later forgotten and has since been relearnt later in the 20th century and made many correct assumptions. Their work is the bedrock of our understanding of phosgene toxicity that survives to this day. The horrors of chemical warfare prompted the Geneva Protocol of 1925, prohibiting the use of chemical agents in warfare, and chemical warfare on this scale has not been repeated. The ease with which phosgene can be synthesised requires healthcare providers to be familiar with its effects.

  • phosgene
  • World War 1
  • Chemical Warfare
  • CBRN
  • TOXICOLOGY
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors TCN-R is the sole contributor.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.