Article Text

PDF
Systematic review of caregiver burden in spouses and partners providing informal care to wounded, injured or sick (WIS) military personnel
  1. Gursimran Thandi1,
  2. L Harden1,
  3. L Cole2,
  4. N Greenberg1 and
  5. N T Fear1
  1. 1 Academic Department of Military Mental Health, King’s College London, London, UK
  2. 2 Social Science and Public Policy, King’s College London, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Gursimran Thandi, Academic Department of Military Mental Health, King’s College London, London SE5 9RJ, UK; gursimran.k.thandi{at}kcl.ac.uk

Abstract

Introduction For the purposes of this review, caregivers are individuals who provide care that is typically unpaid and usually takes place at home. This systematic review aims to identify burden among spouses/partners caring for wounded, injured or sick military personnel and the factors associated with caregiver burden.

Methods A systematic review was undertaken using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines. Five electronic databases and relevant websites were searched. Two reviewers appraised the quality of the studies and carried out data extraction.

Results Ten original papers were identified, of which eight were quantitative studies and two were qualitative. These papers highlighted the potential negative impact caregiving can have on spouses/partners and also some of the positive aspects of caring that can strengthen intimate relationships.

Conclusions Caring for an injured or ill military spouse or partner is a difficult task, compounded by the complexity of dealing with potentially both their physical and mental health problems. However, research has also identified some positive aspects of caring that can strengthen intimate relationships.

  • informal caregiving
  • wounded
  • injured
  • sick (wis)
  • military personnel
  • veterans
  • spouse/partner
  • caregiver burden

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors GT developed search strategy, identified search terms, conducted search and extracted articles. GT and LH reviewed articles and carried out quality appraisal. GT extracted data and drafted manuscript. LC, NTF and NG supervised data interpretation and manuscript production.

  • Competing interests NTF, LH, NG and GT work for a department that receives funding from the UK Ministry of Defence.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.