Article Text

Long-term employment outcomes following rehabilitation for significant neurological impairment in UK military personnel: a 3-year study
  1. Sardar Bahadur,
  2. J McRann and
  3. E McGilloway
  1. Department of Neuro-rehabilitation, Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre Headley Court, Epsom, Surrey, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Sardar Bahadur, DMRC Headley Court, Epsom Surrey KT186JW, UK; sbahadur{at}


Background Returning to employment is a major modifiable factor affecting long-term health in brain injury which neurological and vocational rehabilitation attempts to address. In military patients, little is known about long-term employability, whether employment is sustained and how they fare in civilian roles.

Methods A telephone review was undertaken of every military patient having undergone inpatient neurorehabilitation between 2012 and 2014. This was compared to their employment outcomes one to three years post discharge. We further evaluated whether this employment was sustained over successive years in the same patients. Finally, we identify those rehabilitation interventions deemed most influential in improving employment outcomes in brain injury.

Results During this period, an average of 57 (51–61) such patients were discharged each year. A review conducted by telephone successfully contacted 46% (43%–49% across cohorts) of all possible patients; 71.4% (64–81) returned to work increasing to 80.7% (76–85) including those training/actively seeking-work. Overall, 31.7% (24–40) returned to full-time military—in those leaving, 89.6% (85.4–90.9) were discharged for medical reasons. Severity of brain injury was unrelated to successful employment; 63.6%/78.6% had the same vocational outcome over two consecutive years while 36.3%/21.4% showed improved outcomes.

Discussion Despite significant brain/neurological injury (graded by severity/Mayo Portland Adaptability Inventory 4), 80.7% (76–85) were working/training 2/3 years postdischarge from neurorehabilitation with 31.7% returning to full-time military role. Inability to continue within the military was not synonymous with inability to work. Return to work was independent of severity of brain/neurological injury and follow-up over consecutive years demonstrated sustained employment. The argument against inpatient neurorehabilitation has always been cost> This 3-year analysis reinforces that patients can and most likely will return to employment with all the benefits this brings to person/family/society. Vocational rehabilitation is therefore recommended for all brain/neurological injury.

  • vocational rehabilitation, military, neurological injury, employment

Statistics from


  • Contributors Dr SB: created and wrote the manuscript, analysed the data, created all the figures/graphs and tables. Ms JMR: collected data, assisted with the manuscript and tables. Dr EMG: reviewed the data and manuscript.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Collaborators Elizabeth Olivier, Katherine Seamen: Department of Neuro-rehabilitation, DMRC Headley Court, Epsom, KT186JW, UK.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.