Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Management of Intestinal Injury in Deployed UK Hospitals
  1. Surg Lt Cdr Anton Fries, RN, Registrar in Plastic Surgery1,
  2. J Penn-Barwell, Registrar in Orthopaedic Surgery2,
  3. NRM Tai, Consultant Surgeon3,
  4. TJ Hodgetts, Formerly Professor of Emergency Medicine4,
  5. MJ Midwinter, Defence Professor of Military Surgery5 and
  6. DM Bowley, Consultant Surgeon6
  1. 1Department of Plastic Surgery, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Barrack Road, EXETER, Devon, EX2 5DW 01392 411611 antonfries{at}
  2. 2City and Sandwell Hospital Birmingham
  3. 3St Bartholemews’ and the London Hospital
  4. 4Royal Centre of Defence Medicine
  5. 5Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Birmingham
  6. 6Heart of England NHS Trust


Introduction Definitive laparotomy (DL), with completion of all surgical tasks at first laparotomy has traditionally been the basis of surgical care of severe abdominal trauma. Damage control surgery (DCS) with a goal of physiological normalisation achieved with termination of operation before completion of anatomical reconstruction, has recently found favour in management of civilian trauma. This study aims to characterise the contemporary UK military surgeon’s approach to abdominal injury.

Patients and methods A retrospective analysis was performed on British service personnel who underwent a laparotomy for intestinal injury at UK forward hospitals from November 2003 to March 2008 as identified from the Joint Theatre Trauma Registry. Patient demographics, mechanism and pattern of injury and clinical outcomes were recorded. Surgical procedures at first and subsequent laparotomy were evaluated by an expert panel.

Results 22 patients with intestinal injury underwent laparotomy and survived to be repatriated; all patients subsequently survived to hospital discharge. Mechanism of injury was GSW in seven and blast in 13. At primary laparotomy, as defined by the operating surgeon, 15/22 underwent DL and 7/22 underwent DCS. Mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 19 for DL patients compared to 29 for DCS patients (p=0.021). Of the 15 patients undergoing DL nine had primary repair (suture or resection / anastomosis), one of which subsequently leaked. Unplanned re-look was required in 4/15 of the DL cases.

Conclusion This review examines the activity of British military surgeons over a time period where damage control laparotomy has been introduced into regular practice. It is performed at a ratio of approximately 1:2 to DL and appears to be reserved, in accordance with military surgical doctrine, for the more severely injured patients. There is a high rate of unplanned relook procedures for DL suggesting DCS may still be underused by military surgeons. Optimal methods of selection and implementation of DCS after battle injury to the abdomen remain unclear.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.